Guinea fowls are becoming popular in many Kenyan homes, yet only a few people truly understand their value. These unique birds offer benefits that go far beyond meat and eggs. Keeping them can transform your homestead in surprising ways.....TAP TO CONTINUE READING

First, guinea fowls are excellent natural security alarms. They make loud, sharp sounds when they sense danger, helping you detect.

strangers, snakes, or unfamiliar animals. Their alertness makes them perfect guardians for your compound.

Second, they are great at controlling pests. Guinea fowls feed on insects like ticks, grasshoppers, and even small snakes. This reduces pests naturally without using chemicals, making your home environment healthier.

Third, these birds require very little feeding. They roam freely and find most of their food from the environment. This makes them cheaper to maintain compared to chickens.

Fourth, guinea fowls have strong immunity. They rarely fall sick, which means you spend less on veterinary care. Their resilience makes them ideal for beginners.

Fifth, their meat is highly nutritious and lean. Many people describe it as tastier and healthier than regular chicken.

Sixth, their eggs have a rich flavour and a longer shelf life. Though smaller than chicken eggs, they are packed with nutrients.

Seventh, guinea fowls help reduce weeds by feeding on unwanted plants around your compound.

Eighth, they add beauty and uniqueness to your home. Their spotted feathers and elegant movement make them attractive birds to keep.

Finally, guinea fowls have a high market value. Their birds, eggs, and meat often sell at better prices.

Keeping guinea fowls is a smart, low-cost way to improve security, food supply, and income at home.

A pharmacist has issued a warning to anyone who takes paracetamol or ibuprofen. There’s something people need to know about the popular medication taken by millions....TAP TO CONTINUE READING

A pharmacist issued a warning about paracetamol and ibuprofen (stock image) (Image: Getty)

Lots of people take pills like paracetamol and ibuprofen as such medications are common go-tos for aches and pains. However, a pharmacist has recently issued a warning to anyone who takes the pills regularly.

It turns out there are some things you need to know about the medication before you take it, and an expert, known as pharmacist Anum online, has recently outlined the things people need to be aware of. Even though she admitted some over the counter medications can be “great”, there are instances where people can experience potential health issues, so you need to be aware of the risks before becoming too reliant on them.

It’s super important information to digest, as paracetamol and ibuprofen are used by millions. Just a few weeks ago, another warning was also issued about taking the medication.

Pharmacist Anum said you need to be investigated by a doctor before taking too many options from over the counter. She started off by talking about indigestion remedies, and she noted they are “completely fine” to use on a short-term basis for most people; however, when people become over-reliant on them, they need to be seen by a doctor.

This is because they need to get to the root of the symptoms if they are not going away. She said it’s crucial you seek medical advice if you find yourself using them too much.

She continued: “What I feel often gets overlooked is painkillers. So super common things. Paracetamol, ibuprofen, co-codamol.

“Again, when used short-term for headaches now and then, or aches and pains now and then, it’s completely fine. When you’re having to rely on these medications day-to-day to do your normal day-to-day activities, that’s an issue if you haven’t been investigated.

“Again, if it sounds like you, speak with your GP, so they can find out the root cause of the pain, and then you can be treated appropriately. Over-using these medications, you’re just increasing the chances of side effects, you can build tolerance to things like co-codamol, making it more difficult to treat your pain in the future.”

So, in a nutshell, you shouldn’t be using the medications too regularly. If you fall into this trap, it could cause you all sorts of problems.
What happens if you become too reliant on them?

Little you may know, it’s possible to take too much paracetamol, and it can lead to serious health consequences such as severe damage to the liver and kidneys and, in some instances, it can even be fatal.

When using it, it’s essential to stick to the recommended dose. When you take too much paracetamol, it can be dangerous, because it can overwhelm the body’s ability to safely process the medication.

Symptoms of liver damage may not be immediately apparent, which is why it’s essential to seek medical attention if you think anything is wrong. Taking too much ibuprofen can also be dangerous.

Overuse of ibuprofen has the potential to lead to issues like stomach aches and indigestion, kidney damage and cardiovascular issues. You should never become too reliant on it or use more than is advised.

As pharmacist Anum stated, using these drugs from time-to-time is usually fine for most people. You just need to ensure you follow the instructions and don’t become too reliant on them.

If you have any concerns about your health, speak to a GP for further advice. It’s always important to report any worrying symptoms so they can be examined.

Discover the natural secret formula to make your manhood bigger, stronger, and longer, also ending premature ejaculation and infertility issues without side effects within a short period. Click here now.....TAP TO CONTINUE READING

She was testifying at the inquiry probing Andrew Chauke’s fitness to hold office, and the room seemed to hold its breath as her words cut through the formal air of the proceedings.

Inquiries of this kind often unfold like slow-moving dramas—heavy with documents, dense with procedure—but occasionally a witness manages to pierce through the legal language and remind everyone why the inquiry matters in the first place. This was one of those moments.

Her testimony captured not only the specifics of the case before the panel but also the broader struggle over integrity and accountability in public institutions. When any senior official’s fitness to hold office is questioned, the implications reach far beyond the fate of one individual. They touch on the public’s confidence in the justice system, the rule of law, and the expectation that those in positions of authority should serve without fear or favour. For many observers, this inquiry represented a test: a test of whether the system can hold its own leaders to the same standards it applies to ordinary citizens.

As she spoke, her voice steady but firm, it became clear that the inquiry was not simply dissecting isolated decisions or administrative missteps. Instead, it was exploring the deeper, more complex question of professional ethics. How should a public official respond when political pressure collides with legal duty? What does accountability look like in a system where the lines between politics and prosecution often blur? And most importantly, who safeguards the public interest when those entrusted with power are themselves under scrutiny?

Her testimony provided snapshots of moments inside the institution—moments where critical choices were made, where doubts emerged, where procedures may have been bent or ignored. She was neither dramatic nor accusatory; she simply described what she had seen and experienced. But sometimes honesty, offered plainly and without theatrics, is the most powerful force in a hearing room.

The inquiry itself is a sign of a maturing democracy—one in which oversight bodies take seriously their responsibility to question those who wield authority. Democracies falter not because of the presence of wrongdoing alone, but because of the absence of accountability. When institutions show the courage to examine their own leaders, they demonstrate resilience rather than weakness.

Still, inquiries are not without tension. They test loyalties, unsettle hierarchies, and expose the uncomfortable gap that can exist between what institutions promise and how they sometimes operate. Witnesses like her, who step forward to speak, embody a form of civic duty that is often overlooked. Their willingness to provide evidence—sometimes at personal or professional risk—helps fortify the walls of public trust.

As she concluded her testimony, the panel members scribbled notes, the gallery whispered, and the weight of her words lingered. The inquiry would continue, with more evidence to sift through and more questions to pursue. But her appearance marked a turning point—a reminder that the search for truth, conducted through due process and transparency, is essential to the health of any democratic institution.

In the end, the inquiry is not only about Andrew Chauke’s future. It is also about reaffirming what the public expects from those who hold power: integrity, accountability, and a commitment to the principles that sustain our democracy.